Thursday, October 14, 2010

the inside story



The above audio is an interview I conducted with Jeff Corbett, a journalist and blogger for the Newcastle Herald. In the interview I explore the effects of technology on journalism, particularly whether technology impedes or improves journalism. Below, I have included some of the research that I undertook in preparation for the interview.

Evidence of research
Subject strand:

“Technological tail-spinning,” from week six of the CMNS3420 course. See Chapter 15 of “Journalism Theory and Practice,” (Tapsall & Varley, 2001).

Purpose:

To seek an answer to my question: “Does technology improve or impede journalism?” by asking someone within the industry for their insight on the subject.
Choice of interviewee:

Jeff Corbett, journalist for the Newcastle Herald. Jeff is widely recognised throughout the Hunter due to his regular opinion pieces and reporting for the Herald. Most importantly, he works with both print and online media. He has worked for many years in the industry (and is very practiced at giving opinions), and is therefore in a very good position to comment on the effects of technology on journalism.

Date and time:

15th October, 10am, at Jeff’s office.
Angle:

It is hard to determine the angle of the interview exactly, as I can not be sure where the interviewee will take it. However for my angle I will be suggesting that online media engages more people, but questioning whether this is degrading the quality of journalism. By the end of the interview I intend for this claim to be either confirmed or denied.


To achieve this, I have the following outline planned, which I will use as a general guide only:

(introduction)


As many of our listeners would be aware, the face of journalism has been changing with the introduction of new technology. I’m talking about the internet, blogging, and online articles. But does this impede or improve journalism? Here to speak with me is Jeff Corbett, journalist and blogger for the Newcastle Herald. Jeff, thanks for being here.
(questions)


You work in both print and online media- do you have a preference?
Do you find there is much difference between the two?

How would you say the content of blogs compares to hard journalism? Would you say that the standard is the same (not the delivery, but the subjects)?

I noticed that your online blogs receives anything from 20 up to 100 or more comments from readers- sometimes within 24 hours of you posting them. Do you think that this shows that more people engage with online media? Would you say this is a good thing?

Do you think your work benefits from this interaction?

Program or publication format:

Triple J’s Hack (“shoving the J into journalism”). The show goes to air each weekday at 5:30pm. According to their website, Hack delivers the most relevant stories of the day from the unique - and often surprising - viewpoint of young Australians.

Intended audience:

The young Australians who commonly comprise Hack’s audience, who are interested in the effect new media has on quality journalism.
Outline of the process:

1. Find a story.

2. Conduct preliminary research.

3. Contact interviewee, request and arrange interview.

4. Conduct in-depth research including preparation of questions.

5. Book and retrieve Marantz recorder.

6. Conduct interview.

7. Return Marantz recorder.

8. Submit assignment.


Background research



Bibliography:

Brand, J., & Roald, Severin. (2000), “Information and Communication Technologies”, in Johnston & Zawawi (eds), Public Relations Theory and Practice, 2nd edn, Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest NSW.

Conley, D., & Lamble, S, (2006), “Online news: journalism’s strands converge,” The Daily Miracle, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

Stanton, R. (2007), Media Relations, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
Tapsall, S., & Varley, C. (eds), (2001), “Technological Tailspinning,” Journalism Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

Tapsall, S., & Varley, C. (eds), (2001), “Journalism in the global village,” Journalism Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.


Earley, D., (2009) “501 Australian Journalists and News Media People on Twitter”, The Earley Edition, retrieved 12/10/10 3:08pm, at http://earleyedition.com/2009/07/04/501-australian-journalists-and-news-media-people-on-twitter/
Earley, D., (2009) “Decline? Yes. Fall? Maybe not”, The Earley Edition, retrieved 12/10/10 3:10pm, at http://earleyedition.com/2009/10/16/decline-and-fall/

Earley, D., (2009) “Value archived news”, The Earley Edition, retrieved 12/10/10 3:20pm, at http://earleyedition.com/2009/09/04/value-archived-news/

Earley, D., (2009) “The pear analytics twitter ‘babble’”, The Earley Edition, retrieved 12/10/10 3:30pm, at http://earleyedition.com/2009/08/18/the-pear-analytics-twitter-babble/

Triple J, (2010), Hack, retrieved 12/10/10 2:33pm, at http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/hack/

Triple J, (2010), “Is the internet re-wiring our brains?”, Hack, retrieved 12/10/10 2:35pm, at http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/hack/stories/s3027019.htm

Monday, October 11, 2010

Blogging- is it really news?

"Journalism's editorial priorities have changed. Entertainment has superseded the provision of information; human interest has supplanted the public interest; measured judgement has succumbed to sensationalism; the trivial has triumphed over the weighty... Traditional news values have been undermined by new values: infotainment is rampant." -British media anlyser Franklin (Tapsall & Varley 2001, "Journalism Theory in Practice", pg 74).

One of the main forms of new news media is blogging. But is it legitimately news? In an upcoming interview, I will be asking a prominent news and opinion piece writer for the Newcastle Herald, whether he considers hard journalism or blog entries as more important for his readers. Tact is recommended.

Consider the content of his blogs:
http://www.theherald.com.au/blogs/jeff-corbett/

Compared with hit-and-runs, locals' participation in the Commonwealth Games, and Maitland's $2 million bridge construction that has been put on hold, the topic of blogs seems somewhat trivial (fro example about TV commercials, roosters and the pain of automated telephone responses). The number of comments on each blog (from 20 to over100!), suggest that the public are indeed interested in these topics. But does that make them worthy of public interest? I'm not convinced.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

The other side of the coin- entertainment in journalism

"Most consumers of the media feel ill these days, like children given the run of a milk bar. Dazzled by all the lines of brightly packaged confectionary, they have eaten and eaten but, instead of feeling better informed or enterained, their stomachs are groaning and their mouths taste strangely sour."
-Matthew Ricketson (2001 pg 149), Chapter 10 of 'Journalism: Theory in practice'.

Throughout my communications degree I have heard again and again how the new 'infotainment' trend in journalism is degrading our news content and society. For the most part I agree with this assertion, however as a journalist I must consider the pros as well as the cons in order to practice objectivity.

Suite101.com provides the article: "The importance of entertainment journalism." It outlines the positive aspects of entertainment factors in the media, particularly in relation to the film industry. According to Chassity Beals, entertainment journalists offer themselves as alternatives to film critics. This is a good thing because journalists go beyond their own opinion and offer insight into the movie-making history and world. I found the section: "The Good, Bad and the Ugly Side of Movie Critiquing" particularly interesting. It says:

"Aside from the controversy of whether a critic is necessary, becoming a film critic is an incredibly difficult thing to do. Anyone can write film reviews and critique films in a blog, but in journalism there are only about 2,000 openings per year in the United States. The number is far less for a film critic. While you do not have to have a degree to be a film critic, you do need to possess a wide knowledge base, understand the film industry and filmmaking process and have a passion for watching films. Every movie cannot be a Star Wars epic or a blockbuster. To review films effectively you must "take the bad and the ugly with the good," says Robert Newton."

In this light, entertainment journalism is both necessary and beneficial.
Read more at Suite101: The Importance of Entertainment Journalism http://www.suite101.com/content/the-importance-of-entertainment-journalism-a234355#ixzz11kDtW33C